Caesarean Section is Associated with Reduced Early Lactation Performance and Serum Prolactin Levels Compared to Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Observational Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.160320261384Keywords:
Breastfeeding, LATCH Score, Prolactin, Caesarean Section, Vaginal DeliveryAbstract
Background: Breastfeeding is essential for neonatal nutrition, immunity, and maternal health, with early initiation influenced by mode of delivery and hormonal factors such as prolactin. This study aimed to compare breastfeeding effectiveness and serum prolactin levels in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery (NVD) and caesarean section (CS) using the LATCH scoring system.
Methods: This prospective observational study included 800 postpartum women (400 NVD, 400 CS) in a tertiary care hospital in central India over 18 months. Breastfeeding effectiveness was assessed using the LATCH score at 1 hour and 24 hours postpartum. Serum prolactin levels were measured at the same time points. Sociodemographic, obstetric, and clinical variables were recorded. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi-square tests, correlation, and regression models.
Results: Baseline characteristics differed significantly in age and education between groups. At 1-hour postpartum, mean LATCH scores were comparable between NVD and CS groups (4.98 ± 1.81 vs. 4.96 ± 1.74; p = 0.889). At 24 hours, NVD had significantly higher LATCH scores than CS (5.99 ± 1.89 vs. 5.05 ± 1.78; p <0.001). Serum prolactin levels were significantly higher in NVD at both 1 hour (304.30 ± 21.10 vs. 264.74 ± 34.24 ng/mL) and 24 hours (346.75 ± 30.44 vs. 322.34 ± 36.26 ng/mL; p < 0.001). A weak positive correlation was observed between 24-hour LATCH scores and prolactin levels. Mode of delivery was an independent predictor of prolactin levels but not LATCH score.
Conclusion: Caesarean delivery is associated with reduced early breastfeeding performance and lower serum prolactin levels compared to vaginal delivery, particularly evident by 24 hours postpartum. Targeted lactation support is recommended for caesarean-delivered mothers to improve breastfeeding outcomes.
References
1. Modak A, Ronghe V, Gomase KP, Dukare KP. The psychological benefits of breastfeeding: fostering maternal well-being and child development. Cureus. 2023 Oct 9;15(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46730
2. Ciampo LA, Ciampo IR. Breastfeeding and the Benefits of Lactation for Women's Health. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia. 2018;40:354-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1657766 PMid:29980160 PMCid:PMC10798271
3. Prentice AM. Breastfeeding in the modern world. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2022 Jul 12;78(Suppl. 2):29-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000524354 PMid:35679837
4. Meedya S, Fahy K, Kable A. Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: a literature review. Women and birth. 2010 Dec 1;23(4):135-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.02.002 PMid:20299299
5. Griffin CM, Amorim MH, Almeida FD, Marcacine KO, Goldman RE, Coca KP. LATCH as a systematic tool for assessment of the breastfeeding technique in maternity. ACTA Paulista de enfermagem. 2022 Mar 7;35:eAPE03181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO03181
6. Wall-Penner JA, Rasmussen K, Suderman M. Effects of Maternal-Infant Golden Hour on Breastfeeding. SACAD: Scholarly Activities. 2024;2024(2024):136.
7. Gouda AM, Ebrahem GG. Efficacy of Early Skin-to-Skin Contact on Thermal Regulation and Breastfeeding of the Newborns and on 3rd Stage of Labor and Postpartum Maternal Condition. International Journal of Novel Research in Healthcare and Nursing. 2019;6(2):775-86.
8. İsik Y, Dag ZO, Tulmac OB, Pek E. Early postpartum lactation effects of cesarean and vaginal birth. Ginekologia polska. 2016;87(6):426-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2016.0020 PMid:27418219
9. Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2016 Dec;16:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0876-1 PMid:27118118 PMCid:PMC4847344
10. de Arruda GT, Barreto SC, Morin VL, do Nascimento Petter G, Braz MM, Pivetta HM. Is there a relation between mode of delivery and breastfeeding in the first hour of life?. Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde. 2018 Apr 1;31(2):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2018.7321
11. Putri AD. The relationship of early breastfeeding initiation with postpartum maternal prolactin levels. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR). 2019 Jan 2;3(1):5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31674/mjmr.2019.v03i01.002
12. Jensen D, Wallace S, Kelsay P. LATCH: A breastfeeding charting system and documentation tool. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1994 Jan;23(1):27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1994.tb01847.x PMid:8176525
13. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Session 2, The physiological basis of breastfeeding. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148970/
14. Lakshman TK, Sripooja G. LATCH score: efficacy in parturient with term vaginal delivery vs term caesarean section: clinical study at rural tertiary care hospital. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2024;6(2):1223-6.
15. Buranawongtrakoon S, Puapornpong P. Comparison of latch scores at the second day postpartum between mothers with cesarean sections and those with normal deliveries. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2016 Mar 30;6-13
16. Lamba I, Bhardwaj MK, Verma A, Meena E. Comparative Study of Breastfeeding in Caesarean Delivery and Vaginal Delivery Using LATCH Score and Maternal Serum Prolactin Level in Early Postpartum Period. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Apr;73(2):139-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-022-01698-9 PMid:37073235 PMCid:PMC10105808
17. Gunes NE, Cetinkaya S. Analysis of maternal characteristics during breastfeeding in early infancy associated with prolactin levels and breastfeeding LATCH scores. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017 Jan;10(1):313.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Babita Singh, Monica Verma, Shraddha Paliwal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author/s retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.
