Comparative Analysis of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures

Bhargav Nimavat; Yashkumar Majithiya

doi:10.55489/njmr.14032024993

Authors

Bhargav Nimavat LG Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
Yashkumar Majithiya BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.14032024993

Keywords:

Tibial shaft fractures, intramedullary nailing, suprapatellar approach, infrapatellar approach, surgical outcomes

Abstract

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures pose a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The selection of the entry point for intramedullary nailing, particularly between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, remains a debated aspect in fracture management. While both approaches aim to restore stability and function, their nuances influence outcomes and patient experiences. This study aims to comprehensively compare the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, analyzing surgical techniques, complications, and functional outcomes to inform clinical decision-making.

Methodology: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients undergoing intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures, comparing outcomes between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Result: Operative time was longer in the infrapatellar group (137.8 minutes) compared to the suprapatellar group (114.4 minutes). The mean radiation dose was higher in the infrapatellar group (74.3 cGY/cm2) and lower in the suprapatellar group (48.5 cGY/cm2). Postoperative outcomes showed a mean Lysholm score of 74 in the infrapatellar group and 90 in the suprapatellar group. one case of infection and one case of malunion were reported in the infrapatellar group, while the suprapatellar group had one infection case but no instances of non-union or malunion.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the surgical and clinical outcomes of the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for tibial shaft fractures. While both techniques offer viable options, the suprapatellar approach may offer advantages in terms of operative efficiency and functional recovery.

References

Swart E, Lasceski C, Latario L, Jo J, Nguyen USDT. Modern treatment of tibial shaft fractures: Is there a role today for closed treatment? Injury 2021;52:1522. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.018 PMid:33046252 PMCid:PMC7534823

Zelle BA, Boni G. Safe surgical technique: intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Patient Saf Surg 2015;9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0086-1 PMid:26692899 PMCid:PMC4676866

Gao F, Wang XH, Xia SL, Zhou XX, Wang MH, Fu BG, et al. Intramedullary Nail Fixation by Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Approaches for Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures. Orthop Surg 2022;14:2350. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13397 PMid:35946437 PMCid:PMC9483059

Patel AH, Wilder JH, Lee OC, Ross AJ, Vemulapalli KC, Glad-den PB, et al. A Review of Proximal Tibia Entry Points for Intramedullary Nailing and Validation of The Lateral Parapatellar Approach as Extra-articular. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022;14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.31909

Gao Z, Han W, Jia H. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibal shaft fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine 2018;97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010917 PMid:29901581 PMCid:PMC6023710

Wang C, Chen E, Ye C, Pan Z. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018;51:133-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.026 PMid:29367045

Yang L, Sun Y, Li G. Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0846-6 PMid:29898758 PMCid:PMC6001044

Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification - PubMed n.d. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8814583/ (accessed February 5, 2024).

Kojima KE, Ferreira RV. TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURES. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2011;46:130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30227-5

Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale - Orthopaedic Scores n.d. https://www.orthopaedicscore.com/scorepages/tegner_lysholm_knee.html (accessed February 5, 2024).

Bell D, Vajuhudeen Z. Dose area product. RadiopaediaOrg 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-80058

Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S. Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar ap-proach. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:256-62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000070 PMid:24464093

Eastman J, Tseng S, Lo E, Li CS, Yoo B, Lee M. Retropatellar technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures: a cadaveric assessment. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:672-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c1d675 PMid:20926965

Sun Q, Nie XY, Gong JP, Wu JZ, Li RL, Ge W, et al. The out-come comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop 2016;40:2611-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3187-2 PMid:27154868

Williamson M, Iliopoulos E, Williams R, Trompeter A. Intra-operative fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during suprapatellar tibial nailing versus infrapatellar tibial nailing. Injury 2018;49:1891-4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.004 PMid:30017180

Valsamis EM, Iliopoulos E, Williams R, Trompeter A. Suprapatellar tibial nailing: a learning curve analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020;46:1107-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01177-3 PMid:31256209

Toivanen JAK, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:580-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200204000-00011 PMid:11940618

Functional Knee Outcomes in Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Does Approach Matter? - PubMed n.d. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26665254/ (accessed February 5, 2024).

Xu H, Gu F, Xin J, Tian C, Chen F. A meta-analysis of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. Heliyon 2019;5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02199 PMid:31517106 PMCid:PMC6734195

Mitchell PM, Weisenthal BM, Collinge CA. No Incidence of Postoperative Knee Sepsis With Suprapatellar Nailing of Open Tibia Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:85-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000725 PMid:27763961