Assessment of Hepato-Renal Biomarkers in Petrol Pump Attendants: Impact of Protective Gear Usage

Authors

  • Harpreet Kaur Walia Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College & Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Vanita Sharma Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College & Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Vijay Chaudhary Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College & Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.13042023982

Keywords:

Renal disease, hepatic impairment, petrochemical product, volatile substance, occupational exposure

Abstract

Background: Petrol Pump attendants (PPA) in India wear a variety of safety gear, including as overalls, masks, and gloves. It is still entirely unknown if they can effectively protect vulnerable organs like the liver and kidney. The study's objective is to examine the hepato-renal axis' biochemical characteristics in PPA employees who wore protective gear while on duty and those who did not.

Methods: The research population was divided into three Groups. Group A consisted of 15 adults male PPAs who had consistently implemented protective measures when administering petroleum products. 32 PPA who did not wear protective gear made up Group B. A total of twenty-eight male adults who had not been exposed to petroleum products made up Group C, the control Group. For PPA selected for the research, a minimum of five years of exposure was required. Through the administration of a questionnaire, data on worker safety was gathered about the usage of self-protective gear as a standard safety procedure for personal protection. To evaluate biochemical indicators of hepato-renal functioning, serum was used. Both the Student's t test and the analysis of variance were used to find statistical differences. It was deemed significant at p 0.05.

Results: ALP, AST, ALT, creatinine, urea, albumin, and total protein activities or levels in both Group A and Group B were substantially different from control (Group C), suggesting liver impairment.

Conclusion: Data from this study indicate that none of the three protective gear options employed by PPA in Group B significantly decreased exposure.

References

Carrieri M, Bonfiglio E, Scapellato ML, Maccà I, Tranfo G, Faranda P, Paci E, Bartolucci GB. Comparison of exposure as-sessment methods in occupational exposure to benzene in gasoline filling-station attendants. Toxicology Letters 2006;162 (2-3):146-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.09.036 PMid:16289653

Brugnone F, Perbellini L, Romeo L, Cerpelloni M, Cecco A, Leopard Barra E, Moro G, Marchiori L, Ferracin A. Environmental exposure and blood levels of benzene in gas station at-tendants. Comparison with the general population. La Medicina del Lavoro 1997;88(2):131-47.

Nganje TN, Edet AE, Ekwere SJ. Distribution of PAHs in surface soils from petroleum handling facilities in Calabar. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 2007;130(1-3):27-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9453-9 PMid:17106773

Kamal A, Cincinelli A, Martellini T, Palchetti I, Bettazzi F, Malik RN. Health and carcinogenic risk evaluation for cohorts ex-posed to PAHs in petrochemical workplaces in Rawalpindi city (Pakistan). International Journal Environmental Health Re-search. 2015; 5:1-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2015.1007843 PMid:25742192

Koch TR, Doumas BT. Bilirubin, total and conjugated, modified Jendrassik- Grof method. Am Ass Clin Chem. 1982; 113.

Kingsley CR. The direct biuret method for determination of se-rum proteins. J Lab Clin Med. 1942; 27: 840-845.

Bergmeyer HU, Scheibe P, Wahlefeld AW. Optimization of methods for aspartate and alanine amino transferase. Clin Chem. 1978; 24:58-73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/24.1.58 PMid:22409

McComb RB, Bowers GN, Jr. A study of optimum buffer conditions for measuring alkaline phosphatase activity in human se-rum. Am Ass Clin Chem. 1972; 18: 97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/18.2.97

ACGIH. TLVs and BEIs. Based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010:13-29.

US EPA. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) on Benzene. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC, 2002.

ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for benzene. (Draft for Public Comment). Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005.

US EPA. Toxicological review of xylene: In support of summary information on Integrated risk information system (IRIS). 2003, Available from www. epa.gov/iris (Accessed October 20, 2011).

US EPA. Toxicological review of toluene: In support of summary information on Integrated risk information system (IRIS). 2005, Available from www. epa.gov/iris (Accessed Oc-tober 15, 2011).

ATSDR. Toxicological profile for ethylbenzene. Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.

Tunsaringkarn T, Siriwong W, Rungsiyothin A, Nopparatbundit S. Occupational Exposure of Gasoline Station Workers to BTEX Compounds in Bangkok, Thailand. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012;3:117-25.

Satake M, Mido Y, Sethi SE, et al. Petroleum and solvents In: Environmental Toxicology. Publish by Discovery Publishing house, Darya Ganji, New Delhi 110 002, India 2001: 52-81.

Kitwattanavong M, Prueksasit T, Morknoy D, Inhala-tion expo-sure to carbonyl compounds and BTEX and health risk assessment of gas station workers in the inner city of Bangkok. Proceedings of the 42nd Asia-pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health (APACPH) Conference on Strengthening Public Health Institutions to Address Non-Communicable Diseases and Emerging Health Challenges, 24-27 November 2010, Bali, Indonesia: 87-8.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Kaur Walia, H., Sharma, V., & Chaudhary, V. (2023). Assessment of Hepato-Renal Biomarkers in Petrol Pump Attendants: Impact of Protective Gear Usage. National Journal of Medical Research, 13(04), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.13042023982

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles