Compliance to Gonioscopy in Patients with Glaucoma Risk Factors: A Clinical Audit from a Tertiary Care Centre

Authors

  • Rashmi Malhotra Department of Opthalmology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Gurvinder Kaur Department of Opthalmology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Pdiangty Giri Mawlong Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India
  • Anshu Kapoor Department of Opthalmology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.160420261379

Keywords:

Gonioscopy, Glaucoma, Clinical Audit, Compliance, Anterior Chamber Angle, Quality Improvement

Abstract

Background: Gonioscopy is the gold standard for anterior chamber angle assessment and is essential for glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and classification. However, it remains underutilized in routine practice, potentially delaying glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. The study aimed to evaluate the proportion of glaucoma suspect patients undergoing gonioscopy for glaucoma screening and diagnosis and to assess the impact of corrective interventions on adherence to gonioscopy examination.

Methods: This prospective observational clinical audit was conducted in the Ophthalmology Outpatient Department of a tertiary care centre over two audit cycles (April-May and August 2025). Adults (>18 years) with glaucoma risk factors were included. Gonioscopy performance and reasons for non-performance were recorded. Between audit cycles, corrective measures comprising staff education, protocol reinforcement, regular reminders, and enhanced patient counselling were implemented. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test.

Results: Gonioscopy was performed in 18/85 (21.2%) patients during the first audit cycle and increased to 37/51 (72.5%) following corrective interventions. Clinician-related non-performance decreased from 95.5% to 28.6%. The improvement in gonioscopy adherence between the two audit cycles was statistically significant (χ² = 32.83, p <0.001).

Conclusion: Gonioscopy is underutilized in glaucoma suspects, mainly due to clinician-related factors. Staff training, protocol reinforcement, patient counselling, and periodic clinical audits significantly improve adherence and support early glaucoma diagnosis and treatment.

References

1. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study; GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma: A meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020. Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(11):2036-2046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02995-5 PMID: 38565601 PMCID: PMC11269708

2. Barquet-Pizá V, Siegfried CJ. Understanding racial disparities of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 1;35(2):97-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001017 PMid:37922412

3. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 PMid:16488940 PMCID: PMC1856963

4. Senjam SS. Glaucoma blindness-A rapidly emerging non-communicable ocular disease in India: Addressing the issue with advocacy. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2200-2206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_111_20 PMid:32754474 PMCid:PMC7380776

5. Lopes JG, Guedes RAP, Matsumoto RTN, Francesco T. Diagnostic and surgical gonioscopy. Recent advances and perspective. Rev. bras.oftalmol. 2024;83:e0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37039/1982.8551.20240026

6. Keller MJ, Gast TJ, King BJ. Advancements in high-resolution imaging of the iridocorneal angle. Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;3:1229670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2023.1229670 PMid:38983074 PMCid:PMC11182319

7. Murthy GJ, Ariga M, Singh M, George R, Sarma P, Dubey S, et al. A deep dive into the latest European Glaucoma Society and Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society guidelines and their relevance to India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;70(1):24-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1762_21. Erratum in: Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;70(5):1870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.343879. PMID: 34937204 PMCID: PMC8917547

8. Pazos M, Traverso CE, Viswanathan A; European Glaucoma Society; Guidelines Task Force; Guidelines Writers, Authors and Contributors; Guidelines Internal Reviewers; Experts by Experience group (patients' panel); Team of Clinica oculistica of the university of Genoa for medical editing and graphics; External Reviews; EGS Executive Committee; Board of The EGS Foundation. European Glaucoma Society - Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 6th Edition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep 8;109(Suppl 1):1-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2025-egsguidelines PMid:41026937

9. Benitez-Del-Castillo J, Nowrouzi A, Rodriguez-Calzadilla M, Mota-Chozas I, Pinazo-Duran MD. Detection of occludable angle with anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Pentacam as non-contact screening methods. Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;42(7):2093-2105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02208-y PMid:35043245 PMCid:PMC8766219

10. Desmond T, Tran V, Maharaj M, Carnt N, White A. Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT vs gonioscopy for detecting angle closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05271-4. Erratum in: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05432-5. PMID: 34223989 PMCID: PMC8255337

11. Cutolo CA, Bonzano C, Scotto R, Iester M, Bagnis A, Pizzorno C, et al. Moving beyond the Slit-Lamp Gonioscopy: Challenges and Future Opportunities. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 6;11(12):2279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122279 PMid:34943516 PMCid:PMC8700682

12. Dhalla A, Evans T, Pilling J, Auger G. Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus technician led gonioscopy as a triage tool for anterior chamber angle status. Eye (Lond). 2025 Aug;39(12):2474-2478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03906-y PMid:40624244 PMCid:PMC12325918

13. Lee JH, Yoo K, Lung K, Apolo G, Toy B, Sanvicente C, et al. Patterns and Disparities in Recorded Gonioscopy During Initial Glaucoma Evaluations in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;264:90-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.02.032 PMid:38423202 PMCid:PMC11257810

14. Gedde SJ, Chopra V, Vinod K, Bowden EC, Kolomeyer NN, Challa P, et al. Primary Angle-Closure Disease Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2026 Apr;133(4):P153-P201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.12.030 PMid:41665581

15. Chansangpetch S, Rojanapongpun P, Lin SC. Anterior Segment Imaging for Angle Closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;188:xvi-xxix. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.006 PMid:29352976

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Malhotra, R., Kaur, G., Mawlong, P. G., & Kapoor, A. (2026). Compliance to Gonioscopy in Patients with Glaucoma Risk Factors: A Clinical Audit from a Tertiary Care Centre. National Journal of Medical Research, 16(04), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.160420261379

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles