Domain-Specific Cyberchondria and AI-Assisted Health Information Seeking among Pre-Clinical Medical Students in South India: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.160420261370Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Cyberchondria, Health anxiety, Students, Medical, Longitudinal studies, Information seeking behavior, Help-seeking behaviorAbstract
Background: Generative AI is widely used for health information seeking, but its longitudinal relationship with specific cyberchondria domains has not been examined. The objective was to examine domain-specific associations between AI-assisted health information seeking and cyberchondria among medical students, and to assess within-person change after AI adoption or discontinuation.
Methods: Prospective two-wave study of 100 pre-clinical MBBS students at a single South Indian government medical college (January-April 2026; 100% retention). The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-15) was administered at both waves. Students were classified by AI-use status across waves into persistent non-users, new adopters, discontinued users and persistent users. Cohen’s d effect sizes, paired t-tests and Spearman rank correlations were applied.
Results: AI use was reported by 81% at Wave 1 and 83% at Wave 2. AI users scored higher than non-users on Excessiveness (d=0.96), Distress (d=0.55) and Reassurance (d=0.53); Compulsion and Mistrust differed minimally. In a small, underpowered subgroup of new adopters (n=12), Distress increased significantly (Δ=+0.39, d=0.69, p=0.036); this within-person result is exploratory. Search frequency correlated with Excessiveness (ρ=0.47), Reassurance (ρ=0.57), Compulsion (ρ=0.35) and Distress (ρ=0.32). Pre-consultation symptom searching had a large effect on Excessiveness (d=1.04).
Conclusion: AI users showed higher Excessiveness, Distress and Reassurance; only Distress rose significantly, and only within a small new-adopter subgroup, where it should be read as exploratory. Search frequency was the most consistent and most modifiable correlate.
References
1. Schenkel SK, Jungmann SM, Gropalis M, Witthöft M. Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e27835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27835 PMid:34792473 PMCid:PMC8663695
2. Vismara M, Varinelli A, Pellegrini L, Enara A, Fineberg NA. New challenges in facing cyberchondria during the coronavirus disease pandemic. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022;46:101156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101156 PMid:35581995 PMCid:PMC9098916
3. Yang Y, Ta N, Li Z. Investigating the obsessive and compulsive features of cyberchondria: A holistic review. Front Psychol. 2022;13:897426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897426 PMid:35859839 PMCid:PMC9289532
4. Yun HS, Bickmore T. Online health information-seeking in the era of large language models: Cross-sectional web-based survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e68560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/68560 PMid:40163112 PMCid:PMC11997521
5. Mendel T, Singh N, Mann DM, Wiesenfeld B, Nov O. Laypeople's use of and attitudes toward large language models and search engines for health queries: Survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e64290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/64290 PMid:39946180 PMCid:PMC11888097
6. McElroy E, Shevlin M. The development and initial validation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS). J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28(2):259-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.007 PMid:24508033
7. Nasiri M, Mohammadkhani S, Akbari M, Alilou MM. The structural model of cyberchondria based on personality traits, health-related metacognition, cognitive bias, and emotion dysregulation. Front Psychiatry. 2023;13:960055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960055 PMid:36699479 PMCid:PMC9869141
8. Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence for medical education: Potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439 PMid:37651677 PMCid:PMC11838068
9. Sauder M, Tritsch T, Rajput V, Schwartz G, Shoja MM. Exploring generative artificial intelligence-assisted medical education: Assessing case-based learning for medical students. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51961 PMid:38333501 PMCid:PMC10852982
10. Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(5):595-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9549-8 PMid:26931780
11. McElroy E, Kearney M, Touhey J, Evans J, Cooke Y, Shevlin M. The CSS-12: Development and validation of a short-form version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(5):330-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0624 PMid:31013440
12. Agrawal V, Khulbe Y, Singh A, Kar SK. The digital health dilemma: Exploring cyberchondria, well-being, and smartphone addiction in medical and non-medical undergraduates. Indian J Psychiatry. 2024;66(3):256-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_570_23 PMid:39100122 PMCid:PMC11293281
13. El-Zoghby SM, Zaghloul NM, Tawfik AM, Elsherbiny NM, Shehata SA, Soltan EM. Cyberchondria and smartphone addiction: A correlation survey among undergraduate medical students in Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2024;99(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-024-00154-y PMid:38565743 PMCid:PMC10987454
14. Sabir S, Naqvi I. Prevalence of cyberchondria among university students: An emerging challenge of the 21st century. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(8):1634-1639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.7771 PMid:37697754
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jaideep Rao M, Sridhar D, Kiranmai B
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author/s retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.
