Craniofacial Anthropometry and Their Correlation with Personality Traits in Indian Medical Students
Keywords:
Craniofacial anthropometry, Personality traits, Gender differences, Big Five, Medical studentsAbstract
Introduction: This study aimed to explore the relationship between craniofacial anthropometric measurements and personality traits among medical students. Understanding these associations could provide novel insights into how physical characteristics relate to psychological dimensions.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, DMIMS, Wardha, India, involving 295 participants (130 males, 165 females) aged 18–30 years. Craniofacial measurements, including forehead length, bizygomatic width, and cephalic index, were obtained using calibrated instruments. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five Personality Test. Data analysis included Pearson’s correlation and regression models, with p <0.05 considered significant.
Results: Significant gender differences were noted in craniofacial dimensions; males exhibited larger measurements in most parameters, while females had higher cephalic indices. Personality traits also varied, with females scoring higher in Agreeableness and males in Emotional Stability. Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between specific craniofacial features and personality traits, such as Bizigomatic Width with Extraversion and Cranial Length with Intellect/Imagination.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates notable gender differences and significant correlations between craniofacial measurements and personality traits. These findings highlight potential interdisciplinary links between anatomy and psychology, warranting further research in diverse populations.
References
Jones AL, Kramer RSS. Facial first impressions form two clusters representing approach-avoidance. Cogn Psychol. 2021;126:101387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101387 PMid:33964592
Fisher CI, Hahn AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC. Integrating shape cues of adiposity and color information when judging facial health and attractiveness. Perception. 2014;43(6):499-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/p7728 PMid:25154284
Jess Feist GJF. Theories of Personality, Fifth Edition: McGraw-Hill Companies; 1998.
Burger J M. Personality: Thomson Learning and China Light Industry Press; 2004.
PourMohammadBagher L, Kaedi M, Ghasem-Aghaee N, Ören TI. Anger evaluation for fuzzy agents with dynamic personality. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems. 2009;15(6):535-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13873950903139585
Hudek-Knezevic J, Kardum I. Five-factor personality dimensions and 3 health-related personality constructs as predictors of health. Croat Med J. 2009;50(4):394-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2009.50.394 PMid:19673040 PMCid:PMC2728392
Little AC, Perrett DI. Using composite images to assess accuracy in personality attribution to faces. Br J Psychol. 2007;98(Pt 1):111-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712606X109648 PMid:17319053
Wilson V, Weiss A, Lefevre CE, Ochiai T, Matsuzawa T, Inoue-Murayama M, et al. Facial width-to-height ratio in chimpanzees: Links to age, sex and personality. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2020;41(3):226-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.03.001
Borkenau P, Brecke S, Möttig C, Paelecke M. Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. Journal of Research in Personality. 2009;43(4):703-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.007
Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT, Grammer K. Facial symmetry and the 'big-five' personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39(3):523-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.002
Lewis GJ, Lefevre C. E. & Bates T. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents. Pers Individ Dif. 2012;52:855-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.030
Haselhuhn MP, Wong EM. Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings Biological sciences. 2012;279(1728):571-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1193 PMid:21733897 PMCid:PMC3234568
Valentine KA, Li NP, Penke L, Perrett DI. Judging a man by the width of his face: the role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(3):806-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511823 PMid:24458269
Fink B, Haselhuhn MP, Ormiston ME, Wong EM. Men's Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Aggression: A Meta-Analysis. Plos One. 2015;10(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122637 PMid:25849992 PMCid:PMC4388848
Welker KM, Goetz SMM, Carre JM. Perceived and experimentally manipulated status moderates the relationship between facial structure and risk-taking. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2015;36(6):423-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.03.006
Apolo J. Correlation between impulsiveness, cortical thickness and slant of the forehead in healthy adults. Frontiers in Medical Case Reports. 2020;1(3):01-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47746/FMCR.2020.1310
Cristina G, David G, Blas N, Julián G. Bizygomatic width and personality traits of the relational field. International Journal of Morphology. 2019;37(1):184-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022019000100184
Gabarre J, Pastor J, Armengol C, Ferrer S. Bizygomatic width and its association with social and personality traits in males. International Journal of Morphology. 2017;35(3):1037-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000300036
Administering IPIP Measures, with a 50-item Sample Questionnaire. Available from https://ipip.ori.org/New_IPIP-50-item-scale.htm Accessed on Dec 1, 2024.
Krishan K, Kanchan T, Passi N. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions in a North Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(3):167-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.006 PMid:21550566
Franklin D, O'Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Sexual dimorphism in the subadult mandible: quantification using geometric morphometrics. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;167(2-3):175-80. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:3:1:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:3:1:15 PMid:25868885
Patil KR, Mody RN. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric study. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2-3):175-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.071 PMid:15567623
Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(2):322-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322 PMid:11519935
Weisberg YJ, DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front Psychol. 2011;2:178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178 PMid:21866227 PMCid:PMC3149680
Eagly AH, Wood W. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal. Dev Psychol. 2012;138:74-95.
Stirrat M, Perrett DI. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(3):349-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647 PMid:20424067
Pound N, Penton-Voak IS, Brown WM. Facial symmetry is positively associated with self-reported extraversion. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43(6):1572-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.014
Francis-West PH, Robson L, Evans DJ. Craniofacial development: the tissue and molecular interactions that control development of the head. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2003;169:III-VI, 1-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55570-1_1
Zebrowitz LA, Collins MA. Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: the affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1997;1(3):204-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_2 PMid:15659350
Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1571):1638-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 PMid:21536551 PMCid:PMC3130383
Lefevre CE, Etchells PJ, Howell EC, Clark AP, Penton-Voak IS. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not. Biol Lett. 2014 Oct;10(10):20140729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0729 PMid:25339656 PMCid:PMC4272215
Carré JM, McCormick CM. In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proc Biol Sci. 2008;275(1651):2651-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873 PMid:18713717 PMCid:PMC2570531
Archer J. Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(3):319-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007 PMid:16483890
Cashdan E. Hormones and competitive aggression in women. Aggress Behav. 2003;29(2):107-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10041
Hall BK. The neural crest as a fourth germ layer and vertebrates as quadroblastic not triploblastic. Evol Dev. 2000;2(1):3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00032.x PMid:11256415
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ankit Srivastava, Vilas Chimurkar, Vivek Anand Kumar, Anand Bihari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author/s retain the copyright of their article, with first publication rights granted to Medsci Publications.
